What I have come up with.. here goes
TOPIC :
The difference in
English language speaking and writing proficiency among urban and rural
secondary schools students : A comparative study between form 4 PKP MJSC and non-PKP MJSC students.
Purpose :
The purpose of this research is to investigate what is it
that is/are causing the differences in English language speaking and writing
abilities among the students. The investigation will be looking at three core
components which are the location of the
colleges (urban/rural status), the students and the teachers.
Approach : Quantitative
Design : Causal comparative
Techniques :
Significance :
The findings from the research is hoped to provide insights
on what kind of organization and activities that are working in the Bitara
colleges that may be similar or can be adapted into other colleges. These
findings could be a guide to direct on what kind of improvements in teaching
styles and exposure that may increase students’ motivation to speak and write
better in English. As funding is the central issue in governmental schools,
MARA schools does not face those problems are they are well funded. Therefore,
other determining factors that contribute to student performance could be
thoroughly investigated.
Approach : Quantitative
Design : Causal comparative
Techniques :
- Questionnaires with open-ended question to be administered to three form 4 classes at each college.
- Semi-structured interview with four English teachers who teach one or more form 4 classes at each college.
- Semi-structured interview with six form 4 students at each college.
- Expert teacher will be interviewed as well if present.
Problem Statement :
How does the location of
schools positively affects students’ learning of English?
How does variation in
teaching styles influence students learning outcome?
Does school status contribute
to students’ motivation?
Are students in better
performing colleges more motivated to improve their English than others?
RQs
- 1. What kind of feedback from observations helps teachers to improve their teaching efficacy?
- 2. To what extent does school status influence students’ motivation to learn English?
- 3. What do students view as challenging and boring activities in the English speaking and writing class?
Proficiency is determined through the use of English through
speaking and writing as these are the 2 skills that measure students’ knowledge
of English more reliably. This is because students are tested in the
comprehension of the language to be able to produce it. In contrast to
listening and reading, the students may identify and pronounce English words
correctly without the need to understand the meaning.
(Hassan & Rasiah, 2011)
Urban schools : located in an area with a population of more
than 10,000 people
Rural schools : located in an area with a population of less
than 10,000 people
(Ler,
2010)
Limitations :
- The research is limited in its scope as data is only collected from 4 MJSCs (2 Bitara : Taiping, Jasin, Balik Pulau and 2 lower ranking colleges : Tumpat, TUn Ghazali Shafie, Muadzam Shah).
- 4 teachers and 6 form four students will be interviewed.
- At least 2 teachers who have been recently observed by their superior or MARA.
- Interview with students may involve code-switching as some students may not really understand the questions in English. Local dialects such as Kelantanese might also be used by students in which researcher might face problem in interpretation and transcription (Ler, 2010, Talif & Edwin, 1990)
No comments:
Post a Comment